deviant art

Deviant Login
Buy ArtBuy T-Shirts & Gear Buy adCast Buy Premium Membership
Shop		  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
  • Art Print
  • Canvas
  • Photo
  • Art Gifts
Browse More Like This
more ▶

More from *DimensionSeven

Featured in Groups:

Not currently featured in any groups.

Details

November 29, 2009
315 KB
467×700
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 9
Favourites: 69 [who?]


Views: 693 (0 today)

Camera Data

NIKON CORPORATION
NIKON D80
5/100 second
F/11.0
10 mm
100
Nov 8, 2008, 11:39:41 AM
Shop For This Camera
[x]
:icondimensionseven:
2008.11.08, Sásd, Hungary

Got the joke? Blooming-glooming... :lol:

.
.
.

:|

Nikon D80 - Sigma 10-20 @ 10mm - f/11 - 1/20 - iso 100 - Cokin P120 - NEF - Capture NX 1.2 - PS/CS2

Print available! :buymyprints:
Add a Comment:
 
Preview   Add Comment
:iconneoweb:
~neoweb Dec 31, 2009
10/10
Reply
:icondimensionseven:
*DimensionSeven Jan 1, 2010
:blushes:
Reply
:iconthe7thaudia:
~The7thAudia Nov 29, 2009  Student General Artist
Gorgeous photo, Dimension.

I've seen many photos of yours taken with the Sigma 10-20mm, and it only makes me want it more!
Reply
:icondimensionseven:
*DimensionSeven Nov 29, 2009
It's a great lens, just make sure you get a good sample. Oh, and go for the 'older' (variable aperture) version, it's sharper than the new, f/3.5 fixed aperture lens.
Reply
:iconthe7thaudia:
~The7thAudia Nov 29, 2009  Student General Artist
Will do. Thank you for the advice.

Is the older model more expensive?
Reply
:icondimensionseven:
*DimensionSeven Nov 29, 2009
[link]

(scroll down to the verdict).
IMO the older Sigma 10-20 and the Tokina 11-16 f2.8 lenses are the winners on DX for ultrawide. Neither are good for IR though (the only lens that delivers for IR light is the Nikkor 10-24, however both previously mentioned lenses are better in the visible light region than the Nikkor).
Reply
:iconthe7thaudia:
~The7thAudia Nov 29, 2009  Student General Artist
Gotcha. =)
Reply
:icondimensionseven:
*DimensionSeven Nov 29, 2009
No, that's the fun part. The new one is less sharp (esp. in the corners) and more expensive than the older f/4-5,6 version.
Reply
:icondavincipoppalag:
`davincipoppalag Nov 29, 2009
=D BEautiful
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
Preview   Add Comment
©2013 deviantART. All rights reserved
About Us | Contact Us | Developers | Careers | Site Tour | Help & FAQ Advertise | Premium Membership Etiquette | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Copyright Policy